PFE : Summary for Pfizer, Inc. - Yahoo Finance
Gulliver's Travels, or Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World. In Four Parts. Publication date . However, an Assembly of the Houyhnhnms rules that Gulliver, a Yahoo with some .. To this point, Crane brings up the fact that a traditional definition of man – Homo est animal rationale (Humans are rational animals). Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined .. a framework for timely and rational allocation of resources within businesses. Dynamics revenue is largely driven by the number of information workers . We have several partnerships with other companies, including Oath (formerly Yahoo!. Stay up to date with SBS NEWS. App; Subscribe; Follow; Listen; Watch. SBS News App. Download our free app on the App Store or Google Play for the latest .
But plonk the same tendency in our information rich world and we see nonexistent links between cause and effect — conspiracy theories — all over the place. Peer pressure Another reason we are so keen to believe in conspiracy theories is that we are social animals and our status in that society is much more important from an evolutionary standpoint than being right.
Consequently we constantly compare our actions and beliefs to those of our peers, and then alter them to fit in. This means that if our social group believes something, we are more likely to follow the herd. This effect of social influence on behaviour was nicely demonstrated back in by the street corner experimentconducted by the US social psychologist Stanley Milgram better known for his work on obedience to authority figures and colleagues.
The experiment was simple and fun enough for you to replicate. Just pick a busy street corner and stare at the sky for 60 seconds. Now get some friends to join you with your lofty observations. As the group grows, more and more strangers will stop and stare aloft. You have almost certainly seen the same effect in action at markets where you find yourself drawn to the stand with the crowd around it.
The principle applies just as powerfully to ideas.
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)
If more people believe a piece of informationthen we are more likely to accept it as true. And so if, via our social group, we are overly exposed to a particular idea then it becomes embedded in our world view. Social proof is just one of a host of logical fallacies that also cause us to overlook evidence. We all suffer from this. Just think back to the last time you heard a debate on the radio or television.
How convincing did you find the argument that ran counter to your view compared to the one that agreed with it? The chances are that, whatever the rationality of either side, you largely dismissed the opposition arguments while applauding those who agreed with you. Confirmation bias also manifests as a tendency to select information from sources that already agree with our views which probably comes from the social group that we relate too.
Hence your political beliefs probably dictate your preferred news outlets. Of course there is a belief system that recognises logical fallacies such as confirmation bias and tries to iron them out.
Science, through repetition of observations, turns anecdote into data, reduces confirmation bias and accepts that theories can be updated in the face of evidence. That means that it is open to correcting its core texts. Nevertheless, confirmation bias plagues us all.
Star physicist Richard Feynman famously described an example of it that cropped up in one of the most rigorous areas of sciences, particle physics. Naming the myth alongside the reality seems like a good way to compare the fact and falsehoods side by side so that the truth will emerge.
But once again this turns out to be a bad approach, it appears to elicit something that has come to be known as the backfire effectwhereby the myth ends up becoming more memorable than the fact.
Immediately after reading the flyer, participants accurately remembered the facts as facts and the myths as myths. The thinking is that merely mentioning the myths actually helps to reinforce them. And then as time passes you forget the context in which you heard the myth — in this case during a debunking — and are left with just the memory of the myth itself.
To make matters worse, presenting corrective information to a group with firmly held beliefs can actually strengthen their viewdespite the new information undermining it. New evidence creates inconsistencies in our beliefs and an associated emotional discomfort. But instead of modifying our belief we tend to invoke self-justification and even stronger dislike of opposing theories, which can make us more entrenched in our views.
Pick your words wisely. Gulliver's "Master," the Houyhnhnm who took him into his household, buys him time to create a canoe to make his departure easier. After another disastrous voyage, he is rescued against his will by a Portuguese ship. He is disgusted to see that Captain Pedro de Mendez, whom he considers a Yahoo, is a wise, courteous, and generous person.
He returns to his home in England, but he is unable to reconcile himself to living among "Yahoos" and becomes a recluse, remaining in his house, largely avoiding his family and his wife, and spending several hours a day speaking with the horses in his stables.
Composition and history[ edit ] It is uncertain exactly when Swift started writing Gulliver's Travels much of the writing was done at Loughry Manor in CookstownCounty Tyronewhilst Swift stayed there but some sources[ which? According to these accounts, Swift was charged with writing the memoirs of the club's imaginary author, Martinus Scriblerus, and also with satirising the "travellers' tales" literary subgenre. By August the book was complete; and as Gulliver's Travels was a transparently anti- Whig satire, it is likely that Swift had the manuscript copied so that his handwriting could not be used as evidence if a prosecution should arise, as had happened in the case of some of his Irish pamphlets the Drapier's Letters.
In March Swift travelled to London to have his work published; the manuscript was secretly delivered to the publisher Benjamin Mottewho used five printing houses to speed production and avoid piracy.
The first edition was released in two volumes on 28 Octoberpriced at 8s.
Advertising - Oath
These were mostly printed anonymously or occasionally pseudonymously and were quickly forgotten. Swift had nothing to do with them and disavowed them in Faulkner's edition of Swift's friend Alexander Pope wrote a set of five Verses on Gulliver's Travels, which Swift liked so much that he added them to the second edition of the book, though they are rarely included. As revealed in Faulkner's "Advertisement to the Reader", Faulkner had access to an annotated copy of Motte's work by "a friend of the author" generally believed to be Swift's friend Charles Ford which reproduced most of the manuscript without Motte's amendments, the original manuscript having been destroyed.
It is also believed that Swift at least reviewed proofs of Faulkner's edition before printing, but this cannot be proved. Generally, this is regarded as the Editio Princeps of Gulliver's Travels with one small exception. This edition had an added piece by Swift, A letter from Capt. Gulliver to his Cousin Sympson, which complained of Motte's alterations to the original text, saying he had so much altered it that "I do hardly know mine own work" and repudiating all of Motte's changes as well as all the keys, libels, parodies, second parts and continuations that had appeared in the intervening years.
This letter now forms part of many standard texts. Lindalino[ edit ] The five-paragraph episode in Part III, telling of the rebellion of the surface city of Lindalino against the flying island of Laputa, was an obvious allegory to the affair of Drapier's Letters of which Swift was proud. Lindalino represented Dublin and the impositions of Laputa represented the British imposition of William Wood 's poor-quality copper currency.
Faulkner had omitted this passage, either because of political sensitivities raised by an Irish publisher printing an anti-British satire, or possibly because the text he worked from did not include the passage. In the passage was included in a new edition of the Collected Works. Modern editions derive from the Faulkner edition with the inclusion of this addendum. Isaac Asimov notes in The Annotated Gulliver that Lindalino is generally taken to be Dublin, being composed of double lins; hence, Dublin.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Metropolitan Museum of Art Gulliver's Travels has been the recipient of several designations: Published seven years after Daniel Defoe 's wildly successful Robinson CrusoeGulliver's Travels may be read as a systematic rebuttal of Defoe's optimistic account of human capability.
In The Unthinkable Swift: The Spontaneous Philosophy of a Church of England Man, Warren Montag argues that Swift was concerned to refute the notion that the individual precedes society, as Defoe's novel seems to suggest.
Swift regarded such thought as a dangerous endorsement of Thomas Hobbes ' radical political philosophy and for this reason Gulliver repeatedly encounters established societies rather than desolate islands.
The captain who invites Gulliver to serve as a surgeon aboard his ship on the disastrous third voyage is named Robinson. Scholar Allan Bloom points out that Swift's critique of science the experiments of Laputa is the first such questioning by a modern liberal democrat of the effects and cost on a society which embraces and celebrates policies pursuing scientific progress.
Broadly, the book has three themes: A satirical view of the state of European government, and of petty differences between religions An inquiry into whether men are inherently corrupt or whether they become corrupted A restatement of the older "ancients versus moderns" controversy previously addressed by Swift in The Battle of the Books In storytelling and construction the parts follow a pattern: The causes of Gulliver's misadventures become more malignant as time goes on—he is first shipwrecked, then abandoned, then attacked by strangers, then attacked by his own crew.
Gulliver's attitude hardens as the book progresses—he is genuinely surprised by the viciousness and politicking of the Lilliputians but finds the behaviour of the Yahoos in the fourth part reflective of the behaviour of people. Gulliver's viewpoint between parts is mirrored by that of his antagonists in the contrasting part—Gulliver sees the tiny Lilliputians as being vicious and unscrupulous, and then the king of Brobdingnag sees Europe in exactly the same light; Gulliver sees the Laputians as unreasonable, and his Houyhnhnm master sees humanity as equally so.
No form of government is ideal—the simplistic Brobdingnagians enjoy public executions and have streets infested with beggars, the honest and upright Houyhnhnms who have no word for lying are happy to suppress the true nature of Gulliver as a Yahoo and are equally unconcerned about his reaction to being expelled. Specific individuals may be good even where the race is bad—Gulliver finds a friend in each of his travels and, despite Gulliver's rejection and horror toward all Yahoos, is treated very well by the Portuguese captain, Don Pedro, who returns him to England at the novel's end.
Of equal interest is the character of Gulliver himself—he progresses from a cheery optimist at the start of the first part to the pompous misanthrope of the book's conclusion and we may well have to filter our understanding of the work if we are to believe the final misanthrope wrote the whole work. In this sense Gulliver's Travels is a very modern and complex novel. There are subtle shifts throughout the book, such as when Gulliver begins to see all humans, not just those in Houyhnhnm-land, as Yahoos.
However, a feminist perspective of Gulliver's Travels argues that it is misogynyand not misanthropy, that is shown in Gulliver.
This makes for fun and irony; what Gulliver says can be trusted to be accurate, and he does not always understand the meaning of what he perceives. Also, although Gulliver is presented as a commonplace " everyman ", lacking higher education, he possesses a remarkable natural gift for language.
He quickly becomes fluent in the native tongue of any strange land in which he finds himself, a literary device that adds verisimilitude and humour to Swift's work. Despite the depth and subtlety of the book, it is often classified as a children's story because of the popularity of the Lilliput section frequently bowdlerised as a book for children.
One can still buy books entitled Gulliver's Travels which contain only parts of the Lilliput voyage. Misogyny[ edit ] A well-known underlying theme in Gulliver's Travels is misogyny. Swift uses satire to openly mock misogyny throughout the book, with one of the most cited examples of this coming from Gulliver's description of a Brobdingnagian woman: This made me reflect upon the fair Skins of our English Ladies, who appear so beautiful to us, only because they are of our own Size, and their Defects not to be seen but through a magnifying glass Swift has Gulliver associate these magnified acts of female consumption with the act of "throwing-up" — the opposite of and antidote to the act of gastronomic consumption.
Armintor's comparison focuses on the pocket microscopes that were popular in Swift's time.Definition of Rational Numbers
She talks about how this instrument of science was transitioned to something toy-like and accessible, so it shifted into something that women favored, and thus men lose interest.
This is similar to the progression of Gulliver's time in Brobdingnag, from man of science to women's plaything.
Comic Misanthropy[ edit ] Misanthropy is a theme that scholars have identified in Gulliver's Travels. Crane, and Edward Stone discuss Gulliver 's development of misanthropy and come to the consensus that this theme ought to be viewed as comical rather than cynical. According to Case, Gulliver is at first averse to identifying with the Yahoosbut, after he deems the Houyhnhnms superior, he comes to believe that humans including his fellow Europeans are Yahoos due to their shortcomings.
Perceiving the Houyhnhnms as perfect, Gulliver thus begins to perceive himself and the rest of humanity as imperfect. Stone further suggests that Gulliver goes mentally mad and believes that this is what leads Gulliver to exaggerate the shortcomings of humankind. As a result, Gulliver begins to identify humans as a type of Yahoo.
Furthermore, Crane argues that Swift had to study this type of logic see Porphyrian Tree in college, so it is highly likely that he intentionally inverted this logic by placing the typically given example of irrational beings — horses — in the place of humans and vice versa.
Gulliver's Travels - Wikipedia
From this playing off of familiar genre expectations, Stone deduces that the parallels that Swift draws between the Yahoos and humans is meant to be humorous rather than cynical. When Gulliver is forced to leave the Island of the Houyhnhnmshis plan is "to discover some small Island uninhabited" where he can live in solitude. Instead, he is picked up by Don Pedro's crew. Despite Gulliver's appearance—he is dressed in skins and speaks like a horse—Don Pedro treats him compassionately and returns him to Lisbon.
Though Don Pedro appears only briefly, he has become an important figure in the debate between so-called soft school and hard school readers of Gulliver's Travels. Some critics contend that Gulliver is a target of Swift's satire and that Don Pedro represents an ideal of human kindness and generosity. Gulliver believes humans are similar to Yahoos in the sense that they make "no other use of reason, than to improve and multiply Gulliver sees the bleak fallenness at the center of human nature, and Don Pedro is merely a minor character who, in Gulliver's words, is "an Animal which had some little Portion of Reason.
From toEdward Cave published in occasional issues of The Gentleman's Magazine semi-fictionalized accounts of contemporary debates in the two Houses of Parliament under the title of Debates in the Senate of Lilliput.